Skip to main content

Letter of the Day: $600 a day for a hospital bed illegal under Health Insurance Act

Long-term care act can't be overridden

Windsor Star
Tue Feb 22 2011 
Page: A7 
Byline: Jane E. Meadus 
Column: Letters to the editor 

Re: Crisis designation 'too little, too late,' by Sonja Puzic, Feb. 17.

Gary Switzer, CEO of the Erie-St. Clair Local Health Integration Network, announced recently that the LHIN has designated area hospitals as being in "crisis" mode, allowing hospital patients increased access to long-term care home beds.

While the LHIN does have such authority, the statement that this measure means that "patients who don't accept the first available long-term care bed in the community will face a $600 per day fee to remain at the hospital" is not in accordance with the law.

Under the regulations to the Long-Term Care Homes Act, when hospital patients are designated as "crisis," they move to the top of the list for their home choices.

There is no requirement for them to accept beds in homes they have not applied to, nor to apply to a home because it has an "available" bed.

Further, the maximum a hospital can charge for patients awaiting placement is $53.23 per day pursuant to the regulations of the Health Insurance Act, and not the $600 being quoted. Neither hospitals nor the LHIN have any authority to override the Long-Term Care Homes Act or the Health Insurance Act, even in this crisis situation.

While everyone agrees that hospitals are not the best place for people requiring long-term care to be, it is also not in their best interest to force them into living situations which are unsuitable or far from family, in violation of the law.

JANE E. MEADUS, institutional advocate, Advocacy Centre for the Elderly, Toronto
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th
Post a Comment
Read more

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 
Post a Comment
Read more

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a
Post a Comment
Read more